The escalating conflict between the Puna community in Hawaii and the geothermal energy sector, specifically the Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV), paints a troubling picture. As foreign entities push for more unchecked permits, local residents' serious concerns are being overshadowed. This escalating crisis threatens not just public health but also the environmental integrity of the region.
In a time when transparency and accountability are expected from energy providers, the Puna community is at a pivotal moment, calling for recognition and meaningful action. This article explores the complex situation, including a heartfelt letter from community member Sara Steiner, who is actively fighting against the continuation of permits for PGV.
The Puna Community: A Struggle for Clean Air and Safety
For years, Puna residents have raised concerns about air quality and health risks linked to PGV operations. While geothermal energy is often viewed as a renewable resource, unchecked operations can lead to hazardous outcomes.
Community members report problems such as respiratory issues and skin irritations linked to emissions from the geothermal facility. For instance, a local survey revealed that around 40% of residents reported deteriorating health conditions since the geothermal operations began. These health risks take a significant toll, showing that access to clean air is not just an ideal; it is critical for the community's overall well-being.
Too often, residents feel ignored as they confront the dual threats of unregulated permits and inadequate responses from local authorities. The sense of helplessness in facing environmental and legal turmoil only compounds their frustrations.
Ignoring the Injunction: Regulatory Bodies and Foreign Interests
The Clean Air Branch, and other regulatory agencies, seem to be dismissing the serious claims put forth by local residents. Although a lawsuit concerning PGV’s operations is ongoing, permits continue to be issued without heeding these legal challenges.
Sara Steiner's letter to the Clean Air Branch and Governor Ige is a call for accountability:
"Dear Clean Air Branch, Director Fink, Governor Ige, cc to PUC for publication to Docket 2019-0333
>
I want you all to remember there is a lawsuit over this case and it is in appeals court demanding injunction on any further permits until PGV can provide a lawful EIS that discloses the cumulative effects of their actions on the Kilauea volcano.
>
How quickly you forget Governor Ige had to take over the PGV plant in May of 2018; he found they were not taking the eruption seriously... An entire power plant needs to be kept at the ready at all times because PGV is not firm reliable power.
>
They already went to the PUC in June of 2023 asking to lower the bar and give them a new 35-year contract - but not to expand, to contract down to 30MW, actually a "firm 26MW"...
>
I am asking when the public hearing is in Pahoa to disclose this application and I hereby demand a contested case over this application per Hearing Officer Steven Jacobson's Order of November 2022.
Sincerely,
Sara Steiner"
This letter represents a genuine plea for governance structures to pay attention to community voices and the consequences of ignoring them. It has been going on far to long.
The Cumulative Effects of Geothermal Energy Exploitation
Geothermal energy extraction impacts far more than just the environment. It interlinks human health, environmental sustainability, and economic strategy. Therefore, Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) should thoroughly assess the comprehensive effects on local ecosystems and communities.
Concerns arise from the connection between state and foreign entities running PGV. This relationship raises questions about whether profit is valued over residents' rights to safe living conditions. As the energy landscape shifts, it is vital to align practices with sustainability, ensuring community health concerns are respected.
Local Voices Demand Action
Residents’ resistance against PGV embodies a broader fight for fundamental rights. Advocacy groups within the Puna community are uniting to demand that health and safety take priority over corporate interests. Access to safe, clean air is not just a luxury; it is essential for survival.
Legal actions taken by residents demonstrate the lengths to which they are willing to go to protect their environment. An ongoing injunction emphasizes their determination to postpone additional permits until a lawful EIS can provide clarity on the potential long-term effects of geothermal operations.
Facing the Challenges Ahead
Despite facing significant hurdles, the Puna community remains active, raising awareness and pushing back against the current state of affairs. Town halls and community meetings have become critical platforms for fostering unity among residents, allowing them to share their experiences and devise advocacy strategies.
The situation has attracted the support of environmental experts and activists, which amplifies local voices and highlights the urgent need for change in regulations. This collective strength provides a formidable challenge to the established powers at work.
The Role of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC)
As a key regulatory body, the PUC's choices have significant implications for PGV and the Puna community. Recent applications for permit adjustments indicate a tendency to bend the rules rather than enforce them.
The PUC must heighten its oversight and evaluation. Prioritizing community interests and thoroughly assessing safety concerns before approving any permits is essential. Public hearings, as requested by Sara Steiner, should serve as crucial opportunities for the community to voice their objections and influence decision-making.
A Call for Greater Accountability
The struggle facing the Puna community highlights the challenges for residents living near energy facilities. When governance structures disregard advocacy from local citizens, it sets a troubling standard where corporations overshadow the people they impact.
Community Involvement and Legal Recourse
To protect their rights, Puna residents must actively engage in local governance and regulatory processes. Monitoring developments, participating in public hearings, and pursuing legal options are vital strategies for effecting change.
The legal actions taken, such as the injunction filed by Sara Steiner, demonstrate that residents have the power to hold both corporations and regulatory authorities accountable. This empowerment fosters significant collective action to eliminate threats to the land and air they cherish.
A Demand for Immediate Change
The plight of the Puna community illustrates an urgent situation that requires prompt attention. Recognizing and valuing community voices is crucial for ensuring health and safety in the region.
Granting permits without thorough regulatory oversight can no longer be accepted. The Clean Air Branch and related governing bodies must prioritize community health, safety, and environmental integrity over corporate gain.
As this situation unfolds, community engagement remains essential. The Puna community envisions a future where their voices lead the charge for clean air, safe living conditions, and a sustainable environment, free from the threats posed by unregulated energy development.
Awareness and support for the Puna community are paramount. Together, we can advocate for the clean air they rightfully deserve, ensuring a future that truly embodies the principles of renewable energy—energy that enriches lives rather than jeopardizes them.
Aloha,
thank you for hearing Puna.
KahuPuna
Comments