top of page

The Spiritual and Environmental Impact of Geothermal Development in Puna, Hawaii: Addressing Mockery and Gaslighting in the Face of Ignorance

wearepuna

Nestled on the east coast of the Big Island, Puna is more than just land; it is a vibrant tapestry of culture, history, and spirituality. The Native Hawaiians of this region trace their ancestry to Pele, the goddess of fire and volcanoes. Pele embodies the spirit of the land and its people. This strong connection brings to light the deep spiritual and environmental implications of geothermal development in Puna, and the mockery faced by those who fight to preserve these sacred beliefs.


Geothermal energy is often promoted as a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels, yet the harsh realities on the ground can tell a different story. Many Native Hawaiians believe that extracting geothermal steam from the land siphons off the life force of Pele. This act is seen as a grave affront to the spiritual essence that sustains Puna’s ecosystem. In essence, the delicate equilibrium between humanity and nature is threatened, leading to consequences that ripple through generations.


Understanding the Spiritual Connection to Pele


The people of Puna do not view Pele merely as a deity; she is a vital part of their identity and ancestral lineage. Vibrant legends, such as the tale of Pele's journey across the Hawaiian islands, reinforce their connection to the land. The profound nature of their relationship with Pele fortifies their resistance to any disruption, especially through geothermal extraction #AOLEPGV.


Hawaiian culture promotes a respectful coexistence with nature, encapsulated in the concept of "Aloha ʻĀina," or love for the land. This relationship transcends mere survival, embodying deep respect and gratitude. The prospect of continued unmonitored and completely unregulated geothermal development in Puna threatens to sever this sacred bond. When the landscape is altered, it isn’t just the land that changes—it is the very spirit of the community that gets unsettled.


Moreover, Hawaiian spirituality sees natural forces, such as volcanoes and steam, as living beings. This worldview makes the exploitation of Pele's domain not just an environmental concern but a profound spiritual crisis. The opposition to geothermal development illustrates a larger conflict between industrial progress and indigenous beliefs.


Environmental Concerns: The Ripple Effect of Geothermal Development


While geothermal energy may seem like a green solution, the environmental costs are significant. In Puna, extracting geothermal steam can lead to alarming consequences that threaten both the land and its inhabitants.


For example, clearing land for geothermal plants disrupts unique ecosystems. Species like the Puna caterpillar, the endemic Hawaiian hawk, and the Hawaiian hoary bat face heightened extinction risks due to habitat changes. The drilling process can contaminate groundwater resources and release harmful chemicals into the environment. Moreover, removing steam changes the pressure within the earth, potentially triggering earthquakes. Reports indicate that Hawaii has seen a 30% increase in seismic activity linked to geothermal extraction sites, yet the foreign-owned geothermal plant fracking Kilauea volcano does not permit any data collection.


Air quality is also a major concern. Emissions from geothermal plants include harmful gases like hydrogen sulfide, along with a long list of geothermal chemicals, which have been linked to respiratory problems and other health issues. Residents living close to geothermal facilities have reported increased rates of asthma, and many other ailments such as heavy metals poisoning and central nervous system issues. The community has been crying out for decades yet no studies showing what is actually being forced into all life around the plant.


The effects of geothermal development extend beyond local ecosystems, weaving into the community's very fabric. The environmental repercussions are intricately tied to the spiritual beliefs of the community, complicating discussions about geothermal energy.


Mockery and Gaslighting: The Burden of Ignorance


Despite compelling arguments for preserving Puna's cultural and environmental integrity, advocates for geothermal development often use mockery and gaslighting. This behavior belittles and dismisses the deep-rooted spiritual beliefs of Native Hawaiians, often out of ignorance.


Gaslighting can lead individuals to doubt their understanding of reality. Proponents of geothermal energy may cite scientific data supporting sustainability while ignoring the social, cultural, and spiritual consequences of their actions. This stance undermines the voices of those who have cared for this land for generations.


Moreover, the narrative crafted by geothermal advocates tends to highlight the benefits of clean energy while disregarding its implications for community identity and cultural history. Such attitudes threaten not only indigenous culture but also alienate the people of Puna, creating a chasm of misunderstanding.


Combating Ignorance with Knowledge


To counteract mockery and gaslighting, cultural practitioners, activists, and community members must unite to share vital narratives. Education about the rich spiritual traditions linked to Pele and Puna's landscape is crucial.


Collaboration between environmentalists and Native Hawaiians is key to creating detailed studies that emphasize the importance of protecting the land as a cultural and ecological treasure. Advocating for traditional practices makes it clear that dismissing these views disregards the people who spiritually and physically nurture the land.


Raising awareness about health impacts tied to geothermal development is also essential. Although proponents often claim their operations are safe, gaps remain in scientific studies addressing environmental and health effects in the Puna region. Advocating for rigorous and transparent environmental assessments is imperative before moving forward with such projects.


Embracing a Holistic Approach


Given the ongoing geothermal development debates, a holistic approach is vital—one that considers the spiritual, cultural, and health impacts on indigenous populations.


Working together, scientists and environmental advocates can incorporate indigenous knowledge systems into the research process. Traditional ecological knowledge, built over centuries, can complement contemporary scientific methods and provide sustainable solutions that respect both land and people.


Public forums can educate the broader community on the significance of Pele in Hawaiian spirituality. These conversations can shift the tone from mockery to understanding and empathy, laying a foundation for respectful dialogue.


Furthermore, it is essential for local governance and decision-making bodies to include Native Hawaiian voices in discussions about land use and resource management. Empowering these community members ensures that decisions reflect the values of those who have maintained their connection to the land for generations.


Final Thoughts


Geothermal development in Puna is not just an environmental issue; it intertwines with the spiritual essence of the Native Hawaiian community. Recognizing the significance of Pele and the historical relationship the people have with their land is essential for fostering respectful discussions about energy alternatives.


As challenges like mockery and gaslighting threaten these important conversations, communities must arm themselves with knowledge and understanding. By promoting inclusive dialogues and raising awareness of spiritual and environmental impacts, the people of Puna can stand firm in their beliefs while advocating for a future that honors both nature and its guardians.


In the rich landscape of Puna, each connection forged cannot be severed without consequence. It is our responsibility to recognize and nurture these intricate relationships for the well-being of future generations.


Note: This blog post seeks to present a balanced view on an often contentious topic, aiming to bridge differing perspectives while fostering respectful dialogue.

0 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page