top of page

Unprecedented 2024 Hawaii Geothermal Injunction: A Pro Se Filer's Fight for the Health of Hawaii Island and for Mādame Pele , the Hawaiian Volcano Goddess

wearepuna

See gallery below for KahuPuna Full presentation on brief

The recent appeal filed by Sara Steiner in the Hawaii Supreme Court sheds light on serious environmental and legal concerns surrounding the Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV). As a pro se filer, Steiner passionately advocates for the health of Hawaii Island, highlighting crucial issues that impact both its residents and the environment. This post examines the implications of her brief, its significance, and its potential to transform the future of geothermal energy in Hawaii.






Understanding the Context: Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV)


Puna Geothermal Venture plays an important role in Hawaii's energy scene, helping the state work towards its ambitious renewable energy goals, which aim for 100% clean energy by 2045. However, the extraction methods and management practices raising alarms have prompted residents and activists to voice their concerns. Issues regarding environmental compliance and community health are gaining attention. Steiner’s court document highlights these challenges, serving as a powerful call for community support and awareness.


For example, residents near PGV report increased health issues, including respiratory problems, that they attribute to the plant's operations. In a 2022 survey by the local health department, nearly 40% of nearby residents indicated that they felt their health had been negatively affected by the geothermal activities.


Key Highlights from the Filed Brief


Steiner's appeal includes alarming claims about PGV's operational practices and regulatory adherence. Her brief emphasizes critical aspects that demand public attention.


Steiner claims, “PGV’S FINAL EIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH HAWAII REVISED STATUTES OR HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND WAS COMPILED IN BAD FAITH.”

This statement not only questions the validity of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) but also raises serious concerns about the safety and legality of geothermal operations in the region.


Additionally, she addresses concerns related to

“CONSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS, FAILURE TO DISCLOSE – PGV EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN, LACK OF COUNTY AND STATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS, HISTORICAL HARM FROM PERMITTING AGENCIES AND PGV.”

These claims highlight a dangerous lack of emergency planning and transparency, putting public health and safety at risk.


The Question of Legal Integrity


One of the most pressing concerns in Steiner’s brief states,

 “THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT FAILED TO TAKE A HARD LOOK AT PLAINTIFF’S PROOF.”

This raises significant concerns about the legal accountability of the court, which may have overlooked critical evidence based on the argument by PGV attorneys that there were "no facts to be determined." This raises alarming questions about the commitment to fair treatment under the law.


This issue resonates throughout the Hawaiian Islands. Residents are concerned that their health and safety may be overlooked for corporate interests. With geothermal energy playing a vital role in the state’s green energy initiative, it is crucial that all practices prioritize community welfare.


The Importance of Community Support


The ramifications of this case extend beyond legal jargon and documents. Community support is essential in ensuring that public health and environmental safeguards are in place. Steiner’s efforts feature a grassroots movement fueled by local voices demanding accountability from geothermal operators and the judicial system.


As stated in her brief, “DEFENDANTS ARBITRARILY RELY ON OUTDATED MATERIAL – 2020 USGS ‘HAVE HUMANS’ and 2021 US EPA ‘OPINION’, 1987 PGV EIS, INSTEAD OF DISCLOSING IMPACTS.”

This highlights the urgent need for contemporary data that affects community health and environmental stability. Relying on outdated research can undermine the community's right to a safe and healthy environment.


Constitutional Concerns Raised


Steiner's brief further explores constitutional issues, claiming,

 “THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT DID NOT LOOK AT MY PROOF BECAUSE PGV AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS SAID THE COURT SHOULD NOT LOOK AT MY PROOF.”

This raises serious concerns about justice—specifically, the right to have one’s evidence fully examined. A ruling that dismisses vital evidence based solely on legal technicalities can diminish public confidence in the legal system.


When citizens like Sara Steiner take on the challenge of advocating for environmental justice pro se, they exemplify the best of democratic engagement. This effort is essential for mobilizing community support, as such cases can redefine governance and renewable energy practices in Hawaii.


Environmental Health: A Call to Action


Steiner has filed her Verified HRS § 343 Complaint with a Demand for Injunction to halt any additional permits for PGV’s expansion. Her complaint lists multiple counts that detail violations of state laws and constitutional provisions, illustrating a well-organized strategy to address grievances related to PGV operations and their impact on the community.


As this case progresses, it calls for residents to stay vigilant and proactive in protecting their environmental health. The outcome could set critical precedents for geothermal energy practices not just in Hawaii, but across the country.


Igniting Awareness Through Engagement


This case presents an opportunity for community members to educate themselves about the pressing issues. The relationship between geothermal energy and public health should be a central topic in community discussions.


Residents can play an active role by attending public hearings, sharing updates about the ongoing case, and advocating for stronger government oversight of geothermal activities. Grassroots engagement can lead to broader changes, influencing the policies regarding renewable energy regulation and community safety.


The Future of Hawaii Islands’ Energy Landscape


The unprecedented 2024 Hawaii Geothermal Injunction and Sara Steiner's fight represent crucial moments, not only for renewable energy but for community health and environmental justice. The appeal emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and a commitment to safeguarding the well-being of Hawaii Island.


As Steiner’s brief uncovers numerous legal and environmental oversights by PGV, community unity becomes essential. Supporting her cause elevates the urgency of this mission, ensuring that the voices of individuals who cherish their land ( #alohaaina ) and health are prioritized in the legal arena.


In a climate where renewable energy is essential for sustainability, Hawaii can become a model for responsible energy practices—if all stakeholders, especially advocates like Sara Steiner, are empowered to fight for what is right.


By understanding and engaging with this vital struggle, we can work together toward a more sustainable and healthier future for Hawaii Island.


I dream of a day when #PunaLivesMatter. Together, we can and WILL get there. Mahalo for hearing the community in Radius of Puna Geothermal venture. Scroll this blog and website for more information on this 40+ year community fight in Hawaii.


aloha always,

Jasmine Steiner

KahuPuna

Aloha Activism




 



Past IMPORTANT articles . Please share them all over socials amd with neighbors. Mahalo .













5 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page